From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Daniel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 18, 1975
49 A.D.2d 683 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

July 18, 1975

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County.

Present — Moule, J.P., Cardamone, Simons, Mahoney and Del Vecchio, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: In affirming these convictions we note that the exact issue raised on these appeals with respect to the production of an informant, indeed the very same informant, has been previously determined by us. In People v Law ( 48 A.D.2d 228) we held, under identical circumstances, that the production of the informant was not required. Nor were these appellants denied a public trial by reason of the closing of the courtroom during the testimony of certain police officers actively engaged in on-going drug investigations (People v Hinton, 31 N.Y.2d 71). We have carefully reviewed the other issues raised and find them to be without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Daniel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 18, 1975
49 A.D.2d 683 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

People v. Daniel

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN DANIEL, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 18, 1975

Citations

49 A.D.2d 683 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Citing Cases

People v. Jenkins

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Same memorandum as in People v Daniel ( 49 A.D.2d 683).…