From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. D'Amore

Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District
Oct 20, 1972
288 N.E.2d 697 (Ill. App. Ct. 1972)

Summary

In D'Amore, the defendant's conduct was held to have been sufficient to support the offense when he not only used vile and profane language in front of a substantial crowd of people but disregarded warnings of officers, threatened physical harm to a male friend of his wife and terrified his children.

Summary of this case from People v. Trester

Opinion

No. 72-2 Judgment affirmed; sentence modified.

October 20, 1972. Abstract of Decision

APPEAL from the Circuit Court of Lake County; the Hon. JOHN L. HUGHES, Judge, presiding.

Albert Brooks Friedman, Ltd., of Chicago, for appellant.

Jack Hoogasian, State's Attorney, of Waukegan, (James W. Jerz, of Model State's Attorneys Office, of counsel,) for the People.


Abstract of Decision


Summaries of

People v. D'Amore

Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District
Oct 20, 1972
288 N.E.2d 697 (Ill. App. Ct. 1972)

In D'Amore, the defendant's conduct was held to have been sufficient to support the offense when he not only used vile and profane language in front of a substantial crowd of people but disregarded warnings of officers, threatened physical harm to a male friend of his wife and terrified his children.

Summary of this case from People v. Trester
Case details for

People v. D'Amore

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ANTHONY J…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District

Date published: Oct 20, 1972

Citations

288 N.E.2d 697 (Ill. App. Ct. 1972)
288 N.E.2d 697

Citing Cases

People v. Trester

57 Ill. App.3d 164, 166-67, 372 N.E.2d 1115, 1117. The State relies on People v. D'Amore (1972), 7 Ill.…