From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Currier

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 10, 2011
85 A.D.3d 1657 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. KA 09-01819.

June 10, 2011.

Motion for reargument and/or reconsideration granted and, upon reargument, the memorandum and order entered April 1, 2011 ( 83 AD3d 1421) is amended by deleting the ordering paragraph and substituting the following ordering paragraph "that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice by reversing those parts convicting defendant of criminal trespass in the second degree and dismissing those counts of the indictment, and by reducing the sentences imposed for burglary in the second degree, attempted gang assault in the second degree and assault in the second degree to determinate terms of incarceration of six years, and as modified the judgment is affirmed," and by deleting the last two sentences of the memorandum and substituting the following sentences: "Finally, we agree with defendant that the sentences imposed for burglary in the second degree, attempted gang assault in the second degree and assault in the second degree are unduly harsh and severe. Thus, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice ( see CPL 470.15 [b]), we modify the judgment by reducing the sentences for those counts to determinate terms of incarceration of six years."

Present — Centra, J.P., Peradotto, Lindley, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Currier

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 10, 2011
85 A.D.3d 1657 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

People v. Currier

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PAUL R. CURRIER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 10, 2011

Citations

85 A.D.3d 1657 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 4995
924 N.Y.S.2d 872

Citing Cases

People v. Smart

20[6]; People v. Daggett, 88 A.D.3d 1296, 1298, 930 N.Y.S.2d 745,lv. denied18 N.Y.3d 956, 944 N.Y.S.2d 485,…