From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Currie

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 21, 2018
68 N.Y.S.3d 772 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

2011–11277 Ind.No. 2271/10

02-21-2018

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. James E. CURRIE, appellant.

James E. Currie, Elmira, NY, appellant pro se. Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Cristin N. Connell and John B. Latella of counsel), for respondent.


James E. Currie, Elmira, NY, appellant pro se.

Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Cristin N. Connell and John B. Latella of counsel), for respondent.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., JEFFREY A. COHEN, COLLEEN D. DUFFY, BETSY BARROS, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated September 30, 2015 ( People v. Currie, 131 A.D.3d 1265, 16 N.Y.S.3d 866 ), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, rendered November 28, 2011.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 103 S.Ct. 3308, 77 L.Ed.2d 987 ; People v. Stultz, 2 N.Y.3d 277, 778 N.Y.S.2d 431, 810 N.E.2d 883 ).

DILLON, J.P., COHEN, DUFFY and BARROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Currie

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 21, 2018
68 N.Y.S.3d 772 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

People v. Currie

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. James E. CURRIE, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 21, 2018

Citations

68 N.Y.S.3d 772 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Citing Cases

Currie v. Graham

The Appellate Division summarily rejected his ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claim. People v.…