From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Curley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 16, 1990
159 A.D.2d 969 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

March 16, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Mark, J.

Present — Denman, J.P., Pine, Lawton, Davis and Lowery, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from his conviction of manslaughter in the second degree, defendant's sole contention is that he was deprived of a fair trial by prosecutorial misconduct. In determining whether a defendant has been deprived of a fair trial by prosecutorial misconduct, we must determine the seriousness and frequency of the alleged misconduct, whether the trial court took appropriate steps to dilute its effect, and whether the jury would have reached the same result if the conduct had not occurred (People v Mott, 94 A.D.2d 415, 419). Our review of the record leads us to conclude that, although there were several improprieties, the court took measures to cure most of them and that, in view of the overwhelming strength of the People's case, defendant was not deprived of a fair trial (see, People v Plant, 138 A.D.2d 968, lv denied 71 N.Y.2d 1031; People v Widger, 126 A.D.2d 962, lv denied 69 N.Y.2d 1011).


Summaries of

People v. Curley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 16, 1990
159 A.D.2d 969 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Curley

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL CURLEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 16, 1990

Citations

159 A.D.2d 969 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
552 N.Y.S.2d 770

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of robbery in the first…

People v. Soto

03), reckless endangerment in the first degree (§ 120.25) and criminal mischief in the fourth degree (§…