From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Curet

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 25, 2012
99 A.D.3d 611 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-10-25

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jose CURET, Defendant–Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Susan H. Salomon of counsel), for appellant. Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Mary Jo L. Blanchard of counsel), for respondent.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Susan H. Salomon of counsel), for appellant. Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Mary Jo L. Blanchard of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John W. Carter, J.), rendered May 6, 2010, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, attempted murder in the second degree, burglary in the first degree, attempted robbery in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to an aggregate term of 43 years to life, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reducing the periods of postrelease supervision for the attempted murder, burglary, attempted robbery and weapon possession convictions from 10 years to 5 years, and otherwise affirmed.

The court properly declined to charge the affirmative defense to felony murder (Penal Law § 125.25[3] ) since there was no reasonable view of the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to defendant, to support that defense ( see e.g. People v. Baity, 178 A.D.2d 190, 577 N.Y.S.2d 262 [1st Dept. 1991],lv. denied 79 N.Y.2d 943, 583 N.Y.S.2d 197, 592 N.E.2d 805 [1992] ). Defendant bases his argument for charging the affirmative defense on speculative inferences from evidence that tends to negate the affirmative defense more than it supports it. If anything, the evidence cited by defendant suggests that he had reason to believe he was embarking on the kind of robbery that could only be carried out by means of deadly weapons, and that had the potential for lethal violence.

As the People concede, defendant's determinate sentences for the nonhomicide convictions carried five-year rather than ten-year periods of postrelease supervision.

GONZALEZ, P.J., MOSKOWITZ, ACOSTA, FREEDMAN, ABDUS–SALAAM, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Curet

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 25, 2012
99 A.D.3d 611 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Curet

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jose CURET…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 25, 2012

Citations

99 A.D.3d 611 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
952 N.Y.S.2d 871
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 7184

Citing Cases

People v. Moses

However, nothing in the People's case demonstrated that defendant lacked a reasonable ground to believe that…

People v. Galeano

Defendant did nothing to register any disagreement with that view. As an alternate holding, we find that…