From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Csoke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 18, 2004
11 A.D.3d 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-01799

October 18, 2004.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Molea, J.), rendered January 15, 2003, convicting him of attempted assault in the second degree and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Before: Prudenti, P.J., Krausman, Adams and Spolzino, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the Supreme Court erred in adjudicating him a second felony offender is unpreserved for appellate review since he did not controvert the allegations in the predicate felony statement, or object to the procedures used by the court in determining his status ( see CPL 470.05; People v. Smith, 73 NY2d 961; People v. Todd, 306 AD2d 504; People v. Alston, 289 AD2d 339). In any event, the defendant's claim that his adjudication as a second felony offender was based upon a foreign conviction is contradicted by the record, which demonstrates that his prior felony conviction occurred in Delaware County, New York.


Summaries of

People v. Csoke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 18, 2004
11 A.D.3d 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Csoke

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. STEVEN CSOKE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 18, 2004

Citations

11 A.D.3d 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
782 N.Y.S.2d 657

Citing Cases

State v. Williams

Thus, although this contention is unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05; People v Proctor, 79…

People v. Sanabria

The defendant has failed to establish that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel ( see…