From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cruz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 26, 1990
160 A.D.2d 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

April 26, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (James Leff, J.).


We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction", we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence (People v Farrar, 52 N.Y.2d 302, 305). Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms." (People v. Felman, 141 A.D.2d 889, 890, lv denied 72 N.Y.2d 918.)

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Sullivan, Milonas, Asch and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Cruz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 26, 1990
160 A.D.2d 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Cruz

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALFREDO CRUZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 26, 1990

Citations

160 A.D.2d 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
559 N.Y.S.2d 508

Citing Cases

Westside Grocery & Deli, LLC v. City of Syracuse

The evidence further showed that the arrests were "predicated on events, circumstances or activities…

Cho v. City of N.Y.

At the time of the relevant events, the Ordinance allowed for the issuance of a temporary closing order…