From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Crum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 2011
81 A.D.3d 619 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 2006-03734.

February 1, 2011.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrero, J.), dated March 7, 2006, which, after a hearing to redetermine the defendant's sex offender risk level pursuant to the stipulation of settlement in Doe v Pataki ( 3 F Supp 2d 456), designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Steven Banks, New York, N.Y. (Ellen Dille of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Morgan Dennehy of counsel; Gamaliel Marrero on the brief), for respondent.

Before: Mastro, J.P., Rivera, Austin and Román, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court's designation of him as a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C is supported by clear and convincing evidence ( see generally Correction Law § 168-n; People v Pettigrew, 14 NY3d 406, 408).


Summaries of

People v. Crum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 2011
81 A.D.3d 619 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

People v. Crum

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTHONY CRUM, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 2011

Citations

81 A.D.3d 619 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 663
915 N.Y.S.2d 876

Citing Cases

People of State v. Wyatt

Accordingly, pursuant to the statutory scheme applicable to the initial risk level determination proceeding,…

People of State v. Bowden

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The Supreme Court's designation of the…