Opinion
May 27, 1997
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Aiello, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the trial court's charge as to the defendant's accessory liability, when viewed as a whole, "adequately conveyed the proper standards" (People v Roman, 190 A.D.2d 831, affd 83 N.Y.2d 866; see, People v. Coleman, 70 N.Y.2d 817).
The defendant's remaining contentions, including those in his supplemental pro se brief, are either unpreserved for review, without merit, or constitute harmless error.
O'Brien, J.P., Goldstein, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.