From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Crosby

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 26, 1984
105 A.D.2d 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

November 26, 1984

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kooper, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

Contrary to defendant's contention on appeal, the Trial Judge correctly denied his motion to suppress his confession. Defendant was given his Miranda rights and waived those rights knowingly and voluntarily before making his statement. As defendant was 17 years of age at the time of his arrest and interrogation, statutes requiring notification of parents of juvenile delinquents (Family Ct Act, § 305.2) and juvenile offenders (CPL 140.20, subd 6; 1.20, subd 42), do not apply.

We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Boyers, J.P., Rubin, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Crosby

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 26, 1984
105 A.D.2d 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

People v. Crosby

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANDRE CROSBY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 26, 1984

Citations

105 A.D.2d 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

People v. Vazquez

It is also undisputed that the defendant was not threatened, abused, or otherwise mistreated by the police (…

People v. Pica

The defendant was five days short of his 17th birthday when he was arrested outside the house where he lived…