From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Crayton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 10, 1994
209 A.D.2d 790 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

November 10, 1994

Appeal from the County Court of Warren County (Moynihan, Jr., J.).


Before trial, the complaining witness in this matter left for Florida without leaving a forwarding address with anyone, including her grown children. Although the witness had testified at the preliminary hearing, she purportedly left New York because she was too emotionally devastated to testify at trial. After attempting to locate the witness, the People proposed to utilize her preliminary hearing testimony at trial pursuant to CPL 670.10. Upon this appeal following his guilty plea, defendant contends that the People failed to exercise due diligence in locating this witness. Nevertheless, our review of the record reveals, inter alia, that the People made extensive, reasonable efforts to locate and secure the attendance of this witness at trial and that her prior testimony would have been properly admissible.

Cardona, P.J., White, Casey, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Crayton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 10, 1994
209 A.D.2d 790 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Crayton

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LEE D. CRAYTON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 10, 1994

Citations

209 A.D.2d 790 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
618 N.Y.S.2d 470

Citing Cases

People v. Combo [4th Dept 2000

At the time of trial, his location in the country of Turkey was unknown and his date of return was uncertain.…

People v. Combo

At the time of trial, his location in the country of Turkey was unknown and his date of return was uncertain.…