In Crampe, the town justice did not make the requisite searching inquiry to insure that defendant was aware of the drawbacks of self-representation before allowing him to go down that path.
Summary of this case from People v. CrampeMarch 9, 2010.
Crimes — Right to Representation Fro Se.
In Crampe, the town justice did not make the requisite searching inquiry to insure that defendant was aware of the drawbacks of self-representation before allowing him to go down that path.
Summary of this case from People v. CrampeFull title:People v. Crampe (Alexander)
Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. SECOND DEPARTMENT
Date published: Mar 9, 2010
The Appellate Division affirmed the judgment as modified. People v Crampe, 26 Misc 3d 144(A), 2010 NY Slip Op…
People v. CrampeThe jury returned a verdict of guilty, and the judge sentenced defendant to six months of incarceration. Upon…