From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cox

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 29, 1984
463 N.E.2d 1227 (N.Y. 1984)

Opinion

Decided March 29, 1984

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, James J. Leff, J.

Richard Ware Levitt for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney ( Richard M. Breslow and Susan Corkery of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, the motion to suppress granted and a new trial ordered.

In the absence of factual findings by the trial court and the Appellate Division that the officers had probable cause to arrest defendant, we cannot say that the search of his duffel bag was lawful. (See People v Gokey, 60 N.Y.2d 309; People v Smith, 59 N.Y.2d 454; cf. People v Harrison, 57 N.Y.2d 470.)

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order reversed, motion to suppress granted and a new trial ordered in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Cox

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 29, 1984
463 N.E.2d 1227 (N.Y. 1984)
Case details for

People v. Cox

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EARL COX, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 29, 1984

Citations

463 N.E.2d 1227 (N.Y. 1984)
463 N.E.2d 1227
475 N.Y.S.2d 375

Citing Cases

People v. Jones

Precisely the same issue was raised by the codefendant Cox in his separate appeal. That appeal resulted in a…

People v. Tratch

An officer who has an independent basis upon which to arrest a defendant may conduct a warrantless search of…