From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cohen

Supreme Court of California
Oct 1, 1866
31 Cal. 210 (Cal. 1866)

Opinion

         Appeal from the District Court, Seventh Judicial District, Napa County.

         COUNSEL:

         Rayle & Pendegast, and W. S. Wells, for Appellant.

         J. G. McCullough, Attorney-General, for the People.


         JUDGES: Sanderson, J.

         OPINION

          SANDERSON, Judge

         Action for taxes against defendant and certain real estate described in the assessment as " claim to and possession of six hundred and nine acres of land in Suscol Valley, particularly described as follows," etc.

         The defendant, by way of defense, averred that the land was public land of the United States, and therefore exempt from taxation. Plaintiff moved for judgment on the pleadings and obtained it, and the defendant has appealed.

         The land itself is not taxed, but the defendant's claim and right of possession is taxed. The question presented is therefore precisely the same which we considered and determined in the case of The People v. Shearer , 30 Cal. 645. Upon the authority of that case the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Cohen

Supreme Court of California
Oct 1, 1866
31 Cal. 210 (Cal. 1866)
Case details for

People v. Cohen

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE v. MORRIS A. COHEN

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Oct 1, 1866

Citations

31 Cal. 210 (Cal. 1866)

Citing Cases

State v. C. P. R. R. Co.

(Gen. Stats. 1081, 1084, 1088; Wright v. Cradlebaugh, 3 Nev. 346; Hale Norcross v. Storey Co., 1 Nev. 104;…

State v. C. P. R. R. Co.

A constructive possession can not exist in the absence of title. ( Hersee v. Porter, 100 N. Y. 403; Hale…