From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Clinton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 10, 2004
8 A.D.3d 794 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

94889.

Decided and Entered: June 10, 2004.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Feldstein, J.), entered October 15, 2003 in Clinton County, which denied petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.

James Robinson, Dannemora, appellant pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Petitioner is currently serving a sentence of 15 years to life in prison upon his 1997 conviction of the crimes of grand larceny in the fourth degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree and forgery in the second degree. He filed the instant application for a writ of habeas corpus claiming, among other things, that he was illegally sentenced as a persistent felony offender. Supreme Court declined to issue the writ or an order to show cause, and denied the petition without a hearing. This appeal ensued.

It is well settled that habeas corpus relief is unavailable where the issues raised in the petition were or could have been raised either on direct appeal or in a CPL article 440 motion (see People ex rel. Burr v. Smith, A.D.3d 773 N.Y.S.2d 913, 913; People ex rel. Encarnacion v. McGinnis, 2 A.D.3d 933, 933, lv denied 1 N.Y.3d 510;People ex rel. Barnett v. Senkowski, 294 A.D.2d 686, 687). Petitioner appealed the judgment of conviction challenging his sentencing as a persistent felony offender, an argument which the Fourth Department rejected (People v. Robinson, 275 A.D.2d 965, 966, lv denied 96 N.Y.2d 738). Given that the issues raised in the petition were or could have been raised on such appeal or in a CPL article 440 motion, the application was properly denied.

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

People v. Clinton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 10, 2004
8 A.D.3d 794 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Clinton

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL. JAMES ROBINSON, Appellant, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 10, 2004

Citations

8 A.D.3d 794 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
777 N.Y.S.2d 920

Citing Cases

Sturgis v. Fischer

This Court finds, however, that whatever the ultimate merits, or lack thereof, of this claim, habeas corpus…

People v. Artus

Supreme Court denied the application without a hearing, and petitioner now appeals. It is well settled that…