From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Clay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 25, 1968
29 A.D.2d 891 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Opinion

March 25, 1968


Judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered February 20, 1967, reversed, on the law, and new trial granted. The findings of fact below are affirmed. Defendant was convicted of manslaughter in the first degree. On the trial, the main theory of the defense was that defendant stabbed the decedent only after he was struck by a pipe wielded by the decedent. Evidence was introduced to support this theory. The defense requested the court to charge that, if the jury find that the decedent feloniously attacked defendant, defendant was justified in standing his ground and, if necessary, striking his assailant. The trial court refused so to charge, but rather charged the jury that, before someone is justified in killing his assailant, he must retreat if he can do so and thus escape attack. Defendant duly excepted. In our opinion, the charge requested by defendant should have been given. When a person is feloniously attacked by another, he is under no duty to retreat ( People v. Ligouri, 284 N.Y. 309). Beldock, P.J., Rabin, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Clay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 25, 1968
29 A.D.2d 891 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)
Case details for

People v. Clay

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHARLES CLAY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 25, 1968

Citations

29 A.D.2d 891 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Citing Cases

People v. Rainey

In our opinion, the learned trial court improperly charged the jury that defendant had an affirmative duty to…

Washington v. Harris

Thus, the victim of a felony could stand his ground and, if necessary, use deadly physical force to repel the…