Summary
In People v Clark (27 N.Y.2d 512), the defendants therein argued in the Court of Appeals that the jostling statute (Penal Law § 165.25) is unconstitutionally vague and unconstitutional as violative of due process in that it fails to require proof of culpable criminal intent to commit larceny.
Summary of this case from People v. NelsonOpinion
Argued April 23, 1970
Decided May 14, 1970
Appeal from the Supreme Court for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts of the Second Judicial Department, ALFRED J. CAWSE, JR., P.J., DONALD L. JACOBY and PAULINE J. MALTER, JJ., LUDWIG C. GLOWA, P.J., PAULINE J. MALTER and RAYMOND REISLER, JJ.
Paul Paksarian and Milton Adler for Robert Clark, appellant.
Diane A. Lebedeff and Milton Adler for Leonard Johnson, appellant.
Eugene Gold, District Attorney ( Harry Brodbar of counsel), for respondent.
Judgments affirmed; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.