From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Chicas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 22, 2002
293 A.D.2d 687 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

1998-09124

Submitted February 19, 2002.

April 22, 2002.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Cacciabaudo, J.), rendered September 15, 1998, convicting him of murder in the second degree and arson in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (Robert B. Kenney of counsel), for appellant.

Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Thomas C. Costello of counsel), for respondent.

Before: A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J., SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence, including a videotaped confession, in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt of arson in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 150.05) and felony murder (Penal Law § 125.25) beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15).

Giving due consideration to the overwhelming nature of the evidence against the defendant with respect to the charges of which he was convicted, and to the remoteness of any possibility of acquittal on those charges (see People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 712-714), we conclude that the imperfections in trial counsel's performance complained of on appeal did not rise to the level of ineffective assistance of counsel (see US Const Amend VI; N.Y. Const, art I, § 6; see also People v. Rivera, 71 N.Y.2d 705, 708; People v. Berroa, 287 A.D.2d 88, 99, lv granted N.Y.2d [Mar. 5, 2002]; People v. Gil, 285 A.D.2d 7, 12).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

PRUDENTI, P.J., FEUERSTEIN, LUCIANO and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Chicas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 22, 2002
293 A.D.2d 687 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

People v. Chicas

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. GERTRUDIS CHICAS, A/K/A TULIO, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 22, 2002

Citations

293 A.D.2d 687 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
740 N.Y.S.2d 637

Citing Cases

People v. Webb

The defendant has failed to show that any actions of the defense team was unreasonable. Further, in light of…

People v. Ramirez

Further, both defendant and his wife were consistent in their testimony that at the time the instant crime…