From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Checo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 15, 1993
194 A.D.2d 410 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

June 15, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Franklin R. Weissberg, J.).


Contrary to defendant's argument on appeal, his guilt of murder in the second degree was proven by the People beyond a reasonable doubt (People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490). Defendant failed to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that he acted herein under the influence of extreme emotional disturbance. Defendant's own testimony indicated that while at the time in question he had been estranged from the victim, his former wife, for some time, and had been experiencing business difficulties, these circumstances were not unusual; his explanation that he experienced "emotion" and "jealousy" at the mere sight of his former wife in the company of another man, did not provide a "reasonable explanation or excuse" for defendant's asserted mental state (People v. White, 79 N.Y.2d 900, 903).

We perceive no abuse of discretion in sentencing herein (People v. Farrar, 52 N.Y.2d 302).

Concur — Carro, J.P., Ellerin, Wallach, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Checo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 15, 1993
194 A.D.2d 410 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Checo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSE CHECO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 15, 1993

Citations

194 A.D.2d 410 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
599 N.Y.S.2d 244

Citing Cases

People v. Tolbert

Although the defendant, through the testimony of a psychologist, attempted to establish that he acted under…

People v. Piquion

The evidence established that, rather than exhibiting a "loss of self-control" (People v. Harris, 95 N.Y.2d…