From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Chamblis

Michigan Court of Appeals
Dec 8, 1978
88 Mich. App. 734 (Mich. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

Docket No. 78-943.

Decided December 8, 1978.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, William L. Cahalan, Prosecuting Attorney, Edward R. Wilson, Principal Attorney, Appeals, and Paul C. Louisell, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.

Mosley Monroe, P.C., for defendant.

Before: J.H. GILLIS, P.J., and D.E. HOLBROOK and R.M. MAHER, JJ.


On November 8, 1977, defendant pled guilty to the crime of assault with intent to rob being armed, MCL 750.89; MSA 28.284, and possession of a firearm in commission of or attempted commission of a felony, MCL 750.227b; MSA 28.424(2).

Defendant raises two issues for our consideration. We find no error in the first issue.

On the second issue, defendant alleges that to convict defendant of each of these offenses violates principles of double jeopardy. We agree. People v Moore, 87 Mich. App. 475; 275 N.W.2d 19 (1978) (J.H. GILLIS, P.J., dissenting), People v Stringer, 87 Mich. App. 481; 275 N.W.2d 25 (1978) (J.H. GILLIS, P.J., dissenting).

We wish to call to the attention of the litigants, the bench and bar that in this opinion we do not rule on the constitutionality of the felony-firearm act itself, but, rather, hold that the double jeopardy provision of the Michigan Constitution and the Constitution of the United States prevents application of the act under the facts of this case. We leave to a later date the issue of the constitutionality of the felony-firearm act when the underlying felony is not firearm related, such as a violation of the controlled substances act or the criminal sexual conduct act.

The conviction for assault with intent to rob being armed is affirmed. The conviction for possession of a firearm in commission of or attempted commission of a felony is vacated.


I concur in the reversal of the defendant's conviction, but I would hold that conviction of both felony-firearm and the underlying felony is in all cases a violation of the constitutional provision against double jeopardy, People v Berry, 85 Mich. App. 764; 272 N.W.2d 604 (1978), Wayne County Prosecutor v Recorder's Court Judge, 85 Mich. App. 727; 272 N.W.2d 587 (1978).


Summaries of

People v. Chamblis

Michigan Court of Appeals
Dec 8, 1978
88 Mich. App. 734 (Mich. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

People v. Chamblis

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v CHAMBLIS

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 8, 1978

Citations

88 Mich. App. 734 (Mich. Ct. App. 1978)
279 N.W.2d 541

Citing Cases

People v. Powell

Conviction of both offenses offends the double jeopardy provision of the Federal and state constitutions…