In People v Cephus (13 Misc 3d 1211[A], 2006 NY Slip Op 51779[U] [Sup Ct, Kings County 2006]), defendant, as relevant here, moved to set aside her sentence on grounds, inter alia, that the sentencing judge did not mention PRS when the sentence was pronounced.
Summary of this case from Quinones v. State of New York Department of Correctional ServicesJune 28, 2006.
Crimes — Sentence — Postrelease Supervision.
In People v Cephus (13 Misc 3d 1211[A], 2006 NY Slip Op 51779[U] [Sup Ct, Kings County 2006]), defendant, as relevant here, moved to set aside her sentence on grounds, inter alia, that the sentencing judge did not mention PRS when the sentence was pronounced.
Summary of this case from Quinones v. State of New York Department of Correctional ServicesFull title:People v. Cephus (Kim)
Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York. Kings County
Date published: Jun 28, 2006
A number of courts since then have attempted to come to grips with the Earley decision. In People v…
Bentley v. DennisonSee, e.g., Quinones v. State of New York Department of Corr., 14 Misc.3d 390, 824 N.Y.S.2d 877, 881 (Sup.Ct.…