From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Carter

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 31, 1967
228 N.E.2d 415 (N.Y. 1967)

Summary

In People v Carter (19 N.Y.2d 967, 968), a one-paragraph decision of the Court of Appeals stated essentially that: "[t]he complainant paid $3,300 for his automobile 10 months prior to its theft.

Summary of this case from Webster v. Farmer

Opinion

Argued May 15, 1967

Decided May 31, 1967

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, JOHN T. CASEY, J.

Arnold C. Peer for appellant.

M. Andrew Dwyer, Jr., District Attorney ( William J. Doyle, Jr., of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment affirmed in the following memorandum. The complainant paid $3,300 for his automobile 10 months prior to its theft. Under the circumstances of this case, such evidence sufficiently established that market value of the automobile was in excess of $500. We have considered the other contentions advanced by defendant and find them without merit.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, KEATING and BREITEL.


Summaries of

People v. Carter

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 31, 1967
228 N.E.2d 415 (N.Y. 1967)

In People v Carter (19 N.Y.2d 967, 968), a one-paragraph decision of the Court of Appeals stated essentially that: "[t]he complainant paid $3,300 for his automobile 10 months prior to its theft.

Summary of this case from Webster v. Farmer
Case details for

People v. Carter

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RONALD K. CARTER…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 31, 1967

Citations

228 N.E.2d 415 (N.Y. 1967)
228 N.E.2d 415
281 N.Y.S.2d 365

Citing Cases

People v. James

The prosecution must establish the market value of the stolen property at the time and place of the crime or…

Webster v. Farmer

The case law as to how much proof is required as to value of these items is by no means totally clear, and…