From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Caputo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 29, 1991
175 A.D.2d 290 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

July 29, 1991

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Wexner, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant's request to call an alibi witness, which application was made immediately prior to the commencement of jury selection. The defendant did not proffer a reasonable excuse for his failure to file a timely "notice of alibi" pursuant to CPL 250.20 (1), and the prosecutor established that because the crime took place 20 months prior to the request, it would be unduly burdensome for the People to locate any witnesses to refute the proposed testimony of the defendant's alibi witness that the defendant was at a bar at the time of the crime (see, People v Marshall, 170 A.D.2d 463; People v Corpas, 150 A.D.2d 710, 711-715; People v Bunting, 134 A.D.2d 646, 648-649; People v Peralta, 127 A.D.2d 803; cf., People v Peterson, 96 A.D.2d 871).

The defendant's other contentions are without merit. Kooper, J.P., Lawrence, Eiber and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Caputo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 29, 1991
175 A.D.2d 290 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Caputo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KEVIN M. CAPUTO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 29, 1991

Citations

175 A.D.2d 290 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
572 N.Y.S.2d 922

Citing Cases

Wade v. Herbert

under the circumstances, the trial court properly found that the defendant failed to demonstrate good cause…

People v. Wade

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law, by reducing the term of imprisonment imposed on the…