From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cannon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 18, 1990
168 A.D.2d 356 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

December 18, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Rothwax, J., Peter McQuillan, J.).


Defendant's convictions arise out of his sales of narcotics with his codefendants, David Richman and Kenneth Jackson, to an undercover officer on several occasions. At trial, during the jury deliberations, Justice Rothwax became ill and Justice McQuillan presided until verdict.

Defendant's claim as to the "mere presence" charge given at trial is unpreserved for appellate review, and we decline to reach it. Further, while the court's initial conspiracy charge may have been incorrect, a proper supplemental charge was given, obviating any prejudice to defendant. Nor was defendant prejudiced by the substitution of Justice McQuillan for the then incapacitated Justice Rothwax. (People v. Lewis, 71 A.D.2d 7, 10.)

We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Ross, Rosenberger, Asch and Wallach, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Cannon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 18, 1990
168 A.D.2d 356 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Cannon

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROGER CANNON, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 18, 1990

Citations

168 A.D.2d 356 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
562 N.Y.S.2d 679

Citing Cases

People v. Thompson

The Appellate Division held that, although no statute authorized the substitution and although the defendant…

People v. Simon

05; People v. Brown, 167 A.D.2d 346). In any event, while the court's initial instruction that guilt need not…