From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Camus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 9, 1998
255 A.D.2d 392 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

November 9, 1998

Appeal from the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that his convictions of assault in the first degree and attempted assault in the first degree were unsupported by legally sufficient evidence of the intent to cause serious physical injury. We disagree. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant intended to inflict serious physical injury. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence ( see, CPL 470.15).

The defendant's contention that the court's interested witness charge was erroneous is without merit ( see, People v. Smith, 240 A.D.2d 600; People v. Holly, 184 A.D.2d 581).

Ritter, J. P., Thompson, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Camus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 9, 1998
255 A.D.2d 392 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Camus

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PEDRO CAMUS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 9, 1998

Citations

255 A.D.2d 392 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
681 N.Y.S.2d 52

Citing Cases

People v. France

The video was properly authenticated by the victim's testimony that it accurately captured the defendant's…

People v. Ranot

Following a jury trial, the defendant was convicted of assault in the first degree and endangering the…