From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Buster

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 2, 1955
286 App. Div. 1141 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)

Opinion

November 2, 1955.

Present — McCurn, P.J., Vaughan, Kimball, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ.


Judgment of conviction reversed on the law and facts and indictment dismissed. Memorandum: The indictment in this case charged defendant with an attempted violation of subdivision 1 of section 1751 of the Penal Law, which makes illegal certain sales of narcotics. The indictment did not charge a violation of subdivision 3 of section 1751, pertaining to unlawful possession. The People's evidence established affirmatively that defendant acted in the transaction solely as the agent of the prospective purchaser. There is nothing to show that the accused received any benefit for bringing trade to the seller, or that the two were associated in distributing narcotics. The learned trial court erred in submitting the case to the jury on the theory that defendant could be convicted of an attempt to sell narcotics even though he acted solely for the buyer. The offenses are distinct ( People v. Pasquarello, 282 App. Div. 405, affd. 306 N.Y. 759; United States v. Sawyer, 210 F.2d 169; United States v. Moses, 220 F.2d 166). All concur. (Appeal from a judgment of Erie Trial Term, convicting defendant of attempting to deal in narcotics.)


Summaries of

People v. Buster

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 2, 1955
286 App. Div. 1141 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)
Case details for

People v. Buster

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CLYDE BUSTER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 2, 1955

Citations

286 App. Div. 1141 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)

Citing Cases

Smith v. State

On the other hand, the holding of this Court in Durham v. State is supported by the following decisions of…

Roy v. State

Where the evidence does not foreclose it, the pertinent authorities establish that such an instruction must…