From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Buster

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 15, 1997
245 A.D.2d 460 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

December 15, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Demakos, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the trial court erred in refusing to give a missing-witness charge is unpreserved for appellate review, as the defendant failed to request the charge and cannot rely on the request of a codefendant ( see, People v. Laboy, 208 A.D.2d 954).

In light of the sufficiency of the corroborative evidence, any error committed by the trial court in refusing to instruct the jury that the defendant could not be convicted without corroboration of his confession was harmless ( see, People v. Coombs, 184 A.D.2d 651; People v. Pullman, 234 A.D.2d 955; People v. Rosado, 194 A.D.2d 466).

Mangano, P.J., Santucci, Joy and Lerner, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Buster

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 15, 1997
245 A.D.2d 460 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Buster

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CLINT BUSTER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 15, 1997

Citations

245 A.D.2d 460 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
666 N.Y.S.2d 462

Citing Cases

People v. Scott

"The evidence at the suppression hearing supports the court's determination that defendant waived his rights…

People v. Rivera

The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his claim that the Trial Judge erred in failing to give…