From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bush

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 16, 2015
129 A.D.3d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

15447, 1742/12

06-16-2015

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Steven BUSH, Defendant–Appellant.

 Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Sharmeen Mazumder of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Allen J. Vickey of counsel), for respondent.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Sharmeen Mazumder of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Allen J. Vickey of counsel), for respondent.

ACOSTA, J.P., RENWICK, MOSKOWITZ, MANZANET–DANIELS, FEINMAN, JJ.

Opinion Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J.), rendered July 25, 2013, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of five years, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the sentence and remanding for resentencing.

The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. On a block that was particularly prone to shootings, an officer saw defendant using both hands to adjust an object about the size of a brick against his chest, under his sweatshirt. Based on his experience, the officer believed that defendant may have been carrying a weapon. When defendant “locked eyes” with the officer, he appeared “very frightened, like his eyes widened,” and he immediately stopped adjusting the object on his chest and dropped his arms to his sides. This behavior evinced a consciousness of guilt that went beyond mere nervousness, and, when added to the prior observations, it gave the officer a founded suspicion of criminality, thereby justifying a common-law inquiry (see Matter of Steven McC., 304 A.D.2d 68, 72–73, 757 N.Y.S.2d 259 [1st Dept.2003], lv. denied 100 N.Y.2d 511, 766 N.Y.S.2d 165, 798 N.E.2d 349 [2003] ; People v. Pines, 281 A.D.2d 311, 722 N.Y.S.2d 239 [1st Dept.2011], affd. 99 N.Y.2d 525, 752 N.Y.S.2d 266, 782 N.E.2d 62 [2002] ). Defendant's immediate flight, before the police could even approach him to make an inquiry, established reasonable suspicion and justified the police pursuit, during which defendant discarded a pistol (see People v. Hernandez, 3 A.D.3d 325, 770 N.Y.S.2d 316 [1st Dept.2004], lv. denied 2 N.Y.3d 741, 778 N.Y.S.2d 466, 810 N.E.2d 919 [2004] ). The record also supports the court's alternative finding that, regardless of the legality of the police pursuit, the seizure was lawful under the doctrine of abandonment (see People v. Boodle, 47 N.Y.2d 398, 402, 418 N.Y.S.2d 352, 391 N.E.2d 1329 [1979], cert. denied 444 U.S. 969, 100 S.Ct. 461, 62 L.Ed.2d 383 [1979] ).

Although defendant was convicted of an armed felony, he was potentially eligible for youthful offender treatment pursuant to the mitigation provisions of CPL 720.10(3). Accordingly, under People v. Rudolph, 21 N.Y.3d 497, 501, 974 N.Y.S.2d 885, 997 N.E.2d 457 (2013), the court was required to make a youthful offender determination (see People v. Flores, 116 A.D.3d 644, 985 N.Y.S.2d 22 [1st Dept.2014] ).


Summaries of

People v. Bush

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 16, 2015
129 A.D.3d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Bush

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Steven Bush…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 16, 2015

Citations

129 A.D.3d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
11 N.Y.S.3d 589
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 5128

Citing Cases

People v. Corona

Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. The officer's common-law inquiry was justified by the…

People v. Corona

The officer's common-law inquiry was justified by the totality of his observations, including the particular…