From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Busby

Supreme Court of California
Jun 5, 1896
113 Cal. 181 (Cal. 1896)

Opinion

         Petition to the Supreme Court to reinstate an appeal after judgment of affirmance.

         COUNSEL:

         J. N. Davidson, L. F. Fisher, and P. E. King, for Appellant.

          W. F. Fitzgerald, Attorney General, for Respondent.


         JUDGES: In Bank.

         OPINION

         THE COURT

         The defendant was convicted of murder and sentenced to be imprisoned for life. His appeal was placed upon the calendar for the May term, but when the case was called there was no appearance in his behalf and there was no brief on file. The judgment and order appealed from were therefore affirmed without an examination of the record. His counsel now petitions the court to reinstate the appeal upon the ground that he was prevented by sickness from preparing a brief or appearing in court on the day set for the hearing.

         We should feel compelled to accept this excuse as a sufficient ground for reinstating the appeal if counsel had pointed out in his petition any error in the record or any plausible claim of error. But no such claim is advanced, and upon an examination of the record the appeal appears to be devoid of merit.

         Petition denied.


Summaries of

People v. Busby

Supreme Court of California
Jun 5, 1896
113 Cal. 181 (Cal. 1896)
Case details for

People v. Busby

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. W. J. BUSBY, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jun 5, 1896

Citations

113 Cal. 181 (Cal. 1896)
45 P. 191

Citing Cases

People v. Sing

( People v. Clark, 121 Cal. 633, [54 P. 147].) In the case of People v. Busby, 113 Cal. 181, [45 P. 191], the…

People v. Glaze

Under the circumstances a long line of decisions holds that the error, if any there be, is deemed to be…