From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Burley

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jun 4, 2014
118 A.D.3d 720 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-06-4

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Troy BURLEY, appellant.

Martin Geduldig, Garden City, N.Y., for appellant. Kathleen M. Rice, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Tammy J. Smiley and Ilisa T. Fleischer of counsel), for respondent.


Martin Geduldig, Garden City, N.Y., for appellant. Kathleen M. Rice, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Tammy J. Smiley and Ilisa T. Fleischer of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robbins, J.), rendered September 28, 2012, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree (two counts), robbery in the third degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree, sexual abuse in the first degree, and forcible touching, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the Supreme Court failed to ascertain his “fitness to proceed” (CPL 730.30[1] ) to trial is without merit. The court ordered an examinationpursuant to CPL 730.30(1), and a psychologist and a psychiatrist each found the defendant fit to stand trial. Relying on the reports of the pretrial examinations conducted less than two months before the trial began, as well as on its own observations of, and interactions with, the defendant, the court providently exercised its discretion in determining that the defendant was fit to proceed. The court was not required, under the circumstances presented, to hold a hearing ( see CPL 730.30[2]; People v. Tortorici, 92 N.Y.2d 757, 766, 686 N.Y.S.2d 346, 709 N.E.2d 87).

The defendant failed to establish that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under either federal or state constitutional standards. The record establishes that defense counsel provided meaningful representation ( see People v. Berroa, 99 N.Y.2d 134, 138, 753 N.Y.S.2d 12, 782 N.E.2d 1148;People v. Henry, 95 N.Y.2d 563, 565, 721 N.Y.S.2d 577, 744 N.E.2d 112;People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 712, 674 N.Y.S.2d 629, 697 N.E.2d 584;People v. Negron, 112 A.D.3d 741, 976 N.Y.S.2d 220). MASTRO, J.P., ROMAN, HINDS–RADIX and LASALLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Burley

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jun 4, 2014
118 A.D.3d 720 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

People v. Burley

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Troy BURLEY, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 4, 2014

Citations

118 A.D.3d 720 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
118 A.D.3d 720
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 4024

Citing Cases

People v. Sulaiman

The court conducted a competency hearing and considered the report of the psychiatrist retained by defense…

People v. Sulaiman

The court conducted a competency hearing and considered the report of the psychiatrist retained by defense…