Summary
noting that Richter accused the prosecutor on appeal "of committing misconduct `by asking appellant about a statement of his non-testifying co-defendant which implicated appellant.'"
Summary of this case from Richter v. HickmanOpinion
1998
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
People v. Branscombe
Court of Appeal of California
Mar 20, 1998
64 Cal.App.4th 807 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)
Summaries of
People v. Branscombe
Court of Appeal of California
Mar 20, 1998
64 Cal.App.4th 807 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)
noting that Richter accused the prosecutor on appeal "of committing misconduct `by asking appellant about a statement of his non-testifying co-defendant which implicated appellant.'"
Summary of this case from Richter v. HickmanCase details for
People v. Branscombe
Case Details
Full title:People v. Branscombe
Court:Court of Appeal of California
Date published: Mar 20, 1998
Citations
64 Cal.App.4th 807 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)
62 Cal.App.4th 444
Citing Cases
Richter v. Hickman
Nevertheless, these statements, as Richter acknowledged on direct appeal, were definitely inculpatory. See…
Harrington v. RichterOn appeal, his conviction was affirmed. People v. Branscombe, 72 Cal.Rptr.2d 773 (App.1998) (officially…