From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Branch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 26, 2008
48 A.D.3d 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2006-05451.

February 26, 2008.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gary, J.), rendered March 24, 2006, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Steven Banks, New York, N.Y. (Amy Donner of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Sholom J. Twersky of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Rivera, J.P., Miller, Dillon and Belen, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court properly excluded his sister's fiancé from the courtroom during the undercover officer's testimony. Once the prosecution met its burden of showing that closure of the courtroom to the general public was required in order to protect the safety of the undercover officer, the burden shifted to the defendant to show that his sister's fiancé was "linked to him by some tie of more significance than ordinary friendship" ( People v Nazario, 4 NY3d 70, 74; see People v Sweeney, 25 AD3d 335, 336). The defendant failed to meet this burden.


Summaries of

People v. Branch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 26, 2008
48 A.D.3d 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

People v. Branch

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CURTIS BRANCH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 26, 2008

Citations

48 A.D.3d 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 1773
853 N.Y.S.2d 133

Citing Cases

People v. Thomas

On the record before us, the trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in excluding Fortunoff…

People v. Thelismond

Contrary to the defendant's contention, his girlfriend's sister was not improperly excluded from the closed…