Summary
In Borzakian, the Second District Court of Appeal reversed a conviction for a traffic infraction based on an automated camera enforcement system, but did so based on a lack of proper authentication and foundation.
Summary of this case from State v. MelskyOpinion
No. S201474.
2012-05-9
PEOPLE v. BORZAKIAN (Annette).
Prior report: Cal.App., 136 Cal.Rptr.3d 772
Review granted on the court's own motion; briefing deferred.
The request for an order directing depublication of the opinion in the above-entitled appeal is denied.
Review is ordered on the court's own motion. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.512(c)(1).)
Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in People v. Goldsmith (2012) 203 Cal.App.4th 1515, 138 Cal.Rptr.3d 305; S201443/B231678 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.512(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court.
Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.520, is deferred pending further order of the court.