From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Blue

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 10, 2016
136 A.D.3d 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

2012-02103 Ind. No. 9844/10.

02-10-2016

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Johnny BLUE, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Dina Zloczower of counsel), for appellant. Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Ruth E. Ross, and Geoffrey Cajigas [Sullivan & Cromwell, LLP], of counsel), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Dina Zloczower of counsel), for appellant.

Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Ruth E. Ross, and Geoffrey Cajigas [Sullivan & Cromwell, LLP], of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Sullivan, J.), rendered February 14, 2012, as amended February 27, 2012, convicting him of rape in the first degree (two counts), sexual abuse in the first degree (two counts), and burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that certain remarks made by the prosecutor during summation deprived him of a fair trial is unpreserved for appellate review, since he either failed to object to the remarks at issue, or made only general objections and failed to request further curative relief when his objections were sustained (see CPL 470.052; People v. Romero, 7 N.Y.3d 911, 912, 828 N.Y.S.2d 274, 861 N.E.2d 89). In any event, the defendant's contention is without merit, as the challenged remarks were either within the bounds of permissible comment, fair response to the defendant's attack on the credibility of the People's witnesses, fair comment on the evidence and the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom, or permissible rhetorical comment (see People v. Halm, 81 N.Y.2d 819, 821, 595 N.Y.S.2d 380, 611 N.E.2d 281; People v. Galloway, 54 N.Y.2d 396, 399, 446 N.Y.S.2d 9, 430 N.E.2d 885; People v. Ashwal, 39 N.Y.2d 105, 109–110, 383 N.Y.S.2d 204, 347 N.E.2d 564).

The sentence imposed was neither illegal nor excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).

MASTRO, J.P., LEVENTHAL, AUSTIN and LaSALLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Blue

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 10, 2016
136 A.D.3d 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Blue

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Johnny BLUE, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 10, 2016

Citations

136 A.D.3d 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 990
24 N.Y.S.3d 532

Citing Cases

People v. Young

The defendant's challenges to the prosecutor's remarks during her opening statement and summation are…

People v. Young

05[2]; People v Romero, 7 NY3d 911, 912). In any event, the defendant's contention is without merit, as the…