From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bloom

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 29, 1928
162 N.E. 533 (N.Y. 1928)

Opinion

Submitted May 7, 1928

Decided May 29, 1928

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

Hyman Bushel and Samuel Gottlieb for appellant.

Joab H. Banton, District Attorney ( Archibald Firestone of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment of Appellate Division and that of Court of Special Sessions reversed and defendant discharged. Defendant is charged only with unlawfully and knowingly possessing policy slips: Held, that although the defendant's gift enterprise constituted a lottery (Penal Law, § 1370), the certificates in his possession were not shown to be policy slips and defendant was not shown to be engaged in the game or scheme commonly known as policy.

Concur: CARDOZO, Ch. J., POUND, CRANE, ANDREWS and O'BRIEN, JJ. Not sitting: LEHMAN and KELLOGG, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Bloom

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 29, 1928
162 N.E. 533 (N.Y. 1928)
Case details for

People v. Bloom

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MAX BLOOM, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 29, 1928

Citations

162 N.E. 533 (N.Y. 1928)
162 N.E. 533

Citing Cases

People v. Weber

Judgment of the County Court of Kings county convicting defendant of the crime of contriving, drawing and…

People v. Valenza

When a "trustee of a trust arising under this article" misappropriates trust funds, the Legislature has…