From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Biglizen

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 21, 1906
185 N.Y. 616 (N.Y. 1906)

Opinion

Argued June 12, 1906

Decided June 21, 1906

Lewis Stuyvesant Chanler and Lorlys Elton Rogers for appellant.

William Travers Jerome, District Attorney ( Robert C. Taylor and E. Crosby Kindleberger of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment of conviction affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, EDWARD T. BARTLETT, VANN, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT and CHASE, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Biglizen

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 21, 1906
185 N.Y. 616 (N.Y. 1906)
Case details for

People v. Biglizen

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v . JACOB BIGLIZEN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 21, 1906

Citations

185 N.Y. 616 (N.Y. 1906)
78 N.E. 1106

Citing Cases

People v. Johnson

In the case at bar, corroborating evidence was presented. The statute does not specifically require a charge…

State v. Guye

And where the state of the evidence is such as to invoke this rule requiring corroboration, the refusal of…