From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bermudez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 12, 1991
177 A.D.2d 323 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

November 12, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Daniel J. Sullivan, J.).


Defendant's argument that the sentencing court should have granted him youthful offender treatment is unpreserved, since defendant failed to move to withdraw his plea on this ground (People v. McHale, 165 A.D.2d 800, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 1023). In any case, the court properly determined that defendant was not eligible for youthful offender status since he was convicted of an armed felony and there were no mitigating circumstances (CPL 720.10 [a] [ii]; [3]).

As the People concede, the maximum sentence that could be imposed on defendant as a juvenile offender for assault in the first degree is 2 1/3 to 7 years (Penal Law § 70.05), and we modify accordingly.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Wallach and Kassal, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Bermudez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 12, 1991
177 A.D.2d 323 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Bermudez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL BERMUDEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 12, 1991

Citations

177 A.D.2d 323 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
576 N.Y.S.2d 56

Citing Cases

People v. Small

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant's argument that the sentencing court should have granted…

People v. Granton

The plea minutes show that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered his plea of guilty…