From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bendix

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 25, 1932
184 N.E. 105 (N.Y. 1932)

Summary

In People v. Bendix (260 N.Y. 590) this court upheld the indeterminate reformatory sentence, in a situation much like the one we are here describing.

Summary of this case from People ex Rel. Kern v. Silberglitt

Opinion

Submitted October 10, 1932

Decided October 25, 1932

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

Alfred I. Rosner for appellant.

Thomas C.T. Crain, District Attorney ( LeRoy Mandle of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: POUND, Ch. J., CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN, HUBBS and CROUCH, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Bendix

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 25, 1932
184 N.E. 105 (N.Y. 1932)

In People v. Bendix (260 N.Y. 590) this court upheld the indeterminate reformatory sentence, in a situation much like the one we are here describing.

Summary of this case from People ex Rel. Kern v. Silberglitt
Case details for

People v. Bendix

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH V. BENDIX…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 25, 1932

Citations

184 N.E. 105 (N.Y. 1932)
184 N.E. 105

Citing Cases

People ex Rel. Kern v. Silberglitt

The question is one of power, not of propriety or good judgment, and power existed here. In People v. Bendix…

People v. Zuckerman

The record in this case indicates that the appellant would not benefit from a prolonged incarceration for…