From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Barron

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 27, 2003
309 A.D.2d 942 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-04712

Argued October 3, 2003.

October 27, 2003.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Lange, J.), rendered May 24, 2002, convicting her of manslaughter in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Bennet Goodman, Bronxville, N.Y., for appellant.

Jeanine Pirro, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Valerie A. Livingston and Richard Longworth Hecht of counsel), for respondent.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., ANITA R. FLORIO, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's claim that the evidence was legally insufficient to support the jury's verdict which acquitted her of manslaughter in the first degree but found her guilty of manslaughter in the second degree based on inconsistency or repugnancy in the verdict is unpreserved for appellate review ( see People v. Alfaro, 66 N.Y.2d 985, 987; People v. Satloff, 56 N.Y.2d 745, 746; People v. Stahl, 53 N.Y.2d 1048, 1050). Moreover, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt ( see People v. Williams, 84 N.Y.2d 925, 926). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see CPL 470.15).

The defendant's claims that she was deprived of a fair trial and was denied her right to confront witnesses are without merit. The trial court's remarks and comments, and the curtailment of the defense counsel's questioning, were proper responses to the defense counsel's tactics ( see People v. Gonzalez, 38 N.Y.2d 208, 210; People v. Serrano, 253 A.D.2d 531, 532; People v. Meade, 198 A.D.2d 307, 308; People v. Troy, 162 A.D.2d 744).

The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

The defendant's remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.

ALTMAN, J.P., FLORIO, FRIEDMANN and MASTRO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Barron

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 27, 2003
309 A.D.2d 942 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Barron

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. BARBARA BARRON, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 27, 2003

Citations

309 A.D.2d 942 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
766 N.Y.S.2d 378

Citing Cases

People v. Upson

The defendant's contention that he was deprived of his right to a fair trial by the County Court's…

People v. Llewellyn

The defendant's contentions that he was deprived of his rights to a fair trial, to confrontation, to present…