From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Barr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 24, 1990
168 A.D.2d 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

December 24, 1990

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Weissman, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Mere eligibility does not mandate youthful offender treatment, and the grant of such a benefit lies wholly within the discretion of the court (see, People v. Jordan, 115 A.D.2d 622). We find that the sentencing court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant youthful offender status. Thompson, J.P., Brown, Balletta, Miller and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Barr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 24, 1990
168 A.D.2d 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Barr

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SAMUEL BARR, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 24, 1990

Citations

168 A.D.2d 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
563 N.Y.S.2d 464

Citing Cases

People v. Wallace

The decision to grant such treatment lies wholly within the discretion of the court (see, CPL 720.20; People…

People v. Vera

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. Mere eligibility for youthful offender status does not mandate…