Opinion
November 15, 1989
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Mark, J.
Present — Callahan, J.P., Denman, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow expert testimony regarding the deficiencies in eyewitness identification (see, People v Cronin, 60 N.Y.2d 430, 433; People v Valentine, 53 A.D.2d 832; People v Schor, 135 Misc.2d 636). We have considered the claims raised by defendant in his supplementary brief and find that none requires reversal.