Summary
In Barker (supra), the court held that the rule that a defendant is entitled to examine statements of a witness in the possession of the prosecution to discover inconsistencies for impeachment purposes did not go so far as to require the police department to produce personnel records.
Summary of this case from People v. NormanOpinion
Gen. No. 51,278. (Abstract of Decision.)
December 13, 1966.
Writ of error to the Criminal Court of Cook County; the Hon. ERVIN J. HASTEN, Judge, presiding.
Judgment of conviction affirmed.
Ronald N. Mora, of Chicago (Stuart B. Scudder, of counsel), for appellant.
Daniel P. Ward, State's Attorney of Cook County, of Chicago (Elmer C. Kissane and James Veldman, Assistant State's Attorneys, of counsel), for appellee.
Not to be published in full.