From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Austin

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Jun 26, 1946
329 Ill. App. 276 (Ill. App. Ct. 1946)

Opinion

Gen. No. 43,699. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed June 26, 1946 Released for publication August 19, 1946

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, § 709when motion in nature of writ of error coram nobis was filed too late. Where motion in nature of writ of error coram nobis was filed, seeking to review and vacate judgment entered against defendants which found them guilty of murder, and defendants contended that five year limitation could not be invoked for reason that defendants had not been permitted to file any proceedings during their incarceration until recent date, and it appeared that petition was not filed until almost ten years after defendants were convicted, held that defendants' contention was untenable.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Criminal Court of Cook county; the Hon. HAROLD G. WARD, Judge, presiding.

Judgment affirmed. Heard in the third division, first district, this court at the April term, 1946.

Abraham Teitelbaum, for appellants;

Max C. Liss, of counsel;

William J. Tuohy, State's Attorney, for appellee;

Edward E. Wilson, John T. Gallagher, Melvin S. Rembe, Joseph A. Pope and C.D. Pemberton, Assistant State's Attorneys, of counsel.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed June 26, 1946; released for publication August 19, 1946.


Summaries of

People v. Austin

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Jun 26, 1946
329 Ill. App. 276 (Ill. App. Ct. 1946)
Case details for

People v. Austin

Case Details

Full title:People of State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Bruno Austin et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: Jun 26, 1946

Citations

329 Ill. App. 276 (Ill. App. Ct. 1946)
67 N.E.2d 883

Citing Cases

United States v. Ragen

It is, therefore, difficult to comprehend the statement of the court in the Van Woods case upon any basis…