From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Anthony

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 11, 1994
208 A.D.2d 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

October 11, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's unsupported conclusory allegations that he was innocent and that assigned counsel had pressured him into pleading guilty were insufficient to establish good cause for the substitution of assigned counsel (People v. Sturgis, 199 A.D.2d 549; People v. Tuttle, 141 A.D.2d 584).

Moreover, under this set of circumstances, where the defendant was not a criminal novice, and his allocution adequately factually established his guilt of the crime charged, it was not an improvident exercise of the court's discretion to deny the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea without conducting a further inquiry (see, CPL 220.60; People v. Dickerson, 163 A.D.2d 610). Thompson, J.P., Miller, O'Brien, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Anthony

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 11, 1994
208 A.D.2d 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Anthony

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RICARDO ANTHONY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 11, 1994

Citations

208 A.D.2d 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
618 N.Y.S.2d 247

Citing Cases

People v. Reels

In any event, the County Court acted properly in advising him of the authorized maximum sentence which could…

People v. Carter

"Trial judges are vested with discretion in deciding plea withdrawal motions because they are best able to…