From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Angarita

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 2, 1998
247 A.D.2d 397 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

February 2, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lipp, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the People failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he intended to kill the deceased. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt of murder in the second degree. The defendant's intent to cause death may be inferred from his action of plunging the knife twice into the deceased's chest ( see, People v. Ruiz, 211 A.D.2d 829; People v. Dixon, 174 A.D.2d 689). There was additional evidence adduced at trial linking the defendant to the gunshot wound sustained by the victim immediately before the stabbing. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see, CPL 470.15).

The sentence imposed was neither harsh nor excessive ( see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 83).

Ritter, J. P., Altman, Friedman and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Angarita

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 2, 1998
247 A.D.2d 397 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Angarita

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NELSON ANGARITA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 2, 1998

Citations

247 A.D.2d 397 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
667 N.Y.S.2d 923

Citing Cases

State v. Bryant

The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt of intentional…

People v. Tigner

In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v Contes, 60…