From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Almonte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 21, 1991
177 A.D.2d 403 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

November 21, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Jeffrey Atlas, J.).


After a joint trial, defendant and his twin brother, Raymond, were convicted as accomplices for selling narcotics to an undercover police officer. Our recent affirmance of the co-defendant's conviction is equally applicable here to the extent that we rejected the argument that the undercover officer's inadvertent reference to a prior drug transaction deprived defendant of a fair trial (see, People v. Almonte, 170 A.D.2d 267, lv denied 77 N.Y.2d 991). In addition, the arresting officer's remark that defendant "struggled" with the officers upon being arrested did not constitute improper evidence of an uncharged crime (see, Richardson, Evidence §§ 167, 220 [Prince 10th ed 1973]).

We have considered the remaining arguments raised by defendant and find they do not warrant reversal.

Concur — Carro, J.P., Milonas, Ellerin, Ross and Asch, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Almonte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 21, 1991
177 A.D.2d 403 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Almonte

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PAUL ALMONTE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 21, 1991

Citations

177 A.D.2d 403 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
576 N.Y.S.2d 247

Citing Cases

People v. Luna

he trial court are also meritless. The Sandoval ruling reveals that the court gave careful consideration to…