From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Alexander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 2, 2002
294 A.D.2d 118 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

965

May 2, 2002.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (George Daniels, J.), rendered March 23, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (two counts), and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 15 years, unanimously affirmed.

ANN M. OLSON, for respondent.

JOHN GEMMILL PRO SE, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Sullivan, Wallach, Rubin, Gonzalez, JJ.


The court properly permitted the People to introduce uncharged crimes evidence on the issue of identity because of the unique modus operandi common to the charged and uncharged crimes, featuring close geographic links as well as the perpetrator's pattern of requesting that the taxi driver-victims stop to permit him to buy marijuana, which defendant invariably referred to as "weed" (see, People v. Beam, 57 N.Y.2d 241, 251-253). The probative value of this evidence outweighed any prejudice to defendant, which was minimized by the court's limiting instructions.

We have considered and rejected the claims contained in defendant'spro se supplemental brief.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Alexander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 2, 2002
294 A.D.2d 118 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

People v. Alexander

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. EDWARD ALEXANDER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 2, 2002

Citations

294 A.D.2d 118 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
740 N.Y.S.2d 873

Citing Cases

People v. Taylor

What has come to be known as the Molineux rule allows the introduction of such evidence, with appropriate…

People v. Taylor

What has come to be known as the Molineux rule allows the introduction of such evidence, with appropriate…