From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Alexander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 5, 1986
120 A.D.2d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

May 5, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunkin, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

At approximately 3:55 P.M. on May 30, 1984, the arresting officers received a radio call, relaying information from an anonymous source to the effect that there were males with guns at the Motor Vehicle Bureau at Merrick Boulevard and Archer Avenue. The radio call contained a description of only one person: a male black wearing a red-hooded sweatshirt. The officers arrived at the designated location within one or two minutes after receiving the radio call. Officer Carbone observed the defendant, a black male wearing a red-hooded sweatshirt, standing alone, approximately 20 feet north of the entrance to the Motor Vehicle Bureau. The defendant was reading a newspaper, which he held in both hands. The officer observed no other person in this business district who matched the radioed description. Immediately after the defendant observed the uniformed officers pull up in the patrol car, he placed his right hand into the central pocket of his sweatshirt. The officers exited the vehicle and went in opposite directions in order to approach the defendant at different angles. They then drew their weapons, instructing the defendant to remove his hand from his pocket, to turn around, and to place both hands up against the wall. A pat down search disclosed a loaded gun in the right side of the central pocket of the defendant's sweatshirt and six bullets in the defendant's right pants pocket.

Confirmation of the description furnished in an anonymous radio tip of a black male with a gun wearing a red-hooded sweatshirt at the designated location, when considered in conjunction with the defendant's act of placing his right hand inside the central pocket of his sweatshirt in reaction to observing the uniformed officers pulling up in their patrol car, sufficed to furnish the officers with reasonable suspicion justifying a forcible stop of the defendant to conduct a protective pat down search (see, People v Benjamin, 51 N.Y.2d 267; People v Bruce, 78 A.D.2d 169; cf. People v Bernard, 41 N.Y.2d 759, 762-763; People v Roberts, 94 A.D.2d 237; People v Farrell, 90 A.D.2d 396, affd 59 N.Y.2d 686; People v Allen, 109 A.D.2d 24; People v Silvestre, 119 A.D.2d 601). Gibbons, J.P., Thompson, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Alexander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 5, 1986
120 A.D.2d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

People v. Alexander

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM ALEXANDER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 5, 1986

Citations

120 A.D.2d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

People v. McCutcheon

dant as the person whom he claimed was carrying a gun. Thus, although the informant left the scene before the…

People v. Johnson

The later forcible stop of the defendant and seizure of the gun were proper, based on the additional…