From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Actie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 21, 1984
99 A.D.2d 815 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

February 21, 1984


Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Deeley, J.), rendered June 18, 1982, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and indictment dismissed. The case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for the purpose of entering an order in its discretion pursuant to CPL 160.50. The prosecution concedes that reversal is mandated because the People presented no evidence at trial that the .22 caliber gun found in defendant's glove compartment was operable and thereby failed to prove that defendant was in possession of a "firearm" within the meaning of subdivision 3 of section 265.00 and section 265.01 Penal of the Penal Law ( People v Grillo, 15 A.D.2d 502; People v De Witt, 285 App. Div. 115 7). In view of the foregoing there is no need to pass on defendant's other contentions. O'Connor, J.P., Weinstein, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Actie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 21, 1984
99 A.D.2d 815 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

People v. Actie

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SAMUEL ACTIE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 21, 1984

Citations

99 A.D.2d 815 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

People v. Blackwell

) The People argue that because an "air pistol" is not included in the definition of "firearm" under Penal…

Rosenfeld v. Dunham

Petitioner asserts correctly that operability of the weapon and liveness of the ammunition are elements of…